Earlier this week I went to a senior management meeting where the main theme for discussion was "people". First on the agenda list was Recruiting Challenges and how to solve them in 2015 which probably burned more than half of the minutes pegged for the meeting.
So the "working group" leader presents and says that he is working with HR on their recruiting numbers and that Recruitment is pretty much doing everything from a sourcing perspective and talks about the different sourcing channels that Recruitment taps. He proposes to bring down average hiring delivery time from 16 weeks to 12 weeks by reducing average sourcing timeline from 4 weeks to effectively zero weeks. How, by improving the process of course!
So a senior guy expresses his disappointment at the situation because this discussion has been taking place for the last hmmm 10 billion years but there seems to be no solution.
Then another senior lady echoes disappointment by saying that for her senior opening, HR only gives her about 3 candidates per week, in trickles, and it does not happen as fast as she wants. She also believes that HR could consider those same candidates for other positions and HR ought to recycle candidates.
Then landslide of suggestions - hire from grad schools, shorten interview process, do this, do that. I mean these are sensible suggestions but first question is - what is the problem!?
It surprises me that some intelligent people with 10 to 20 years experience can not even ask the right questions - such as WHY is this happening and WHAT is the problem? Or perhaps the boardroom transforms everyone into know-it-alls. Someone once told me, when your car breaks down you usually dont tell your mechanic how to fix it.
So what am I getting at? First of all, whoever is driving the meeting has to put better structure into problem solving - simply put, please define the problem statement and get to root cause before any solutioning. You can suggest a million things and apply already short resources to it and get zero results. That will just frustrate the Recruitment staff and in the end you wont get the hires you need.
Here's what I would suggest - just like any business function, recruiting will have its sets of variables and measurable indicators.
> sourcing targets - are target # of candidates sourced on time?
> processing targets - are target # of candidates interviewed and offered on time?
Break down per position or position types/department or whatever.
Now, have these basic metrics you will be able to problem solve further:
IF sourcing targets are not met - WHY? Is it due to lack of sourcing bandwidth, budget, activities or simply lack of supply? Then solve accordingly.
IF processing targets are not met - WHY? Lack of processing bandwidth, messed up logistics schedules, terrible process, delays in decision making? Then solve accordingly.
But the first step would really be measuring and tracking the 2 indicators above.
Then let the solution landslide begin but let it be guided by facts.
